Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Zarova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Zarova[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was essentially a resume (see history), and still is basically a now slightly shorter resume. The job titles do not guarantee notability per GNG or PROF, and the publications likewise don't suggest anything above regular stuff done by a regular academic (look in the history--it's all articles). Not a single secondary source is cited, and the awards and titles, well, they're just job titles. Drmies (talk) 22:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:NOTCV (note: as this appears to be one of those "flyby, hasn't looked for sources" deletes please trout as approriate:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, the article creator appears to have copied this from their creation in Russian WP see here so no help there (and forgot to include a translate notice, tsk, tsk:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 07:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just a carelessly written CV. Fails WP:Prof#C1on citations. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a medium to host your own résumé. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 20:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTRESUME. In 2007, this would be forgivable, but in 2019, everyone knows we are an American charity, not a free web-host for Russians. This is clearly (based on the article history) an autobiography by the subject, who is run of the mill as academics and college administrators go. The burden for conflicts shifts to the fiduciary per Meinhard v. Salmon. Bearian (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Elected Member of the International Statistical Institute is an honorary level of membership from a scholarly society of the type described in WP:PROF#C3, but I think it is not selective enough to pass C3 by itself (as evidenced e.g. by the fact that Zarova and others have been honored despite having citation counts that would not meet C1). And nothing else here appears close to rising to the level of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this resume. Trillfendi (talk) 17:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.