Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena K. Lincoln
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 14:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Elena K. Lincoln[edit]
- Elena K. Lincoln (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A little known academic. Very little citability in GoogleScholar and GoogleBooks, almost nothing in WebOfScience and Scopus. No other evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:BIO (no prestigious awards, journal editorships, named chair appointments, etc.) PROD was cotested by the article's creator. Nsk92 (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A simple google search shows few references to the person. Quiggers1P (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. 21 cites on GS. We normally require many hundreds. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO and lack of secondary coverage. Interestingly, there are plenty of court records on Google for a messy custody battle between "Elena Kourembana Lincoln" and her husband, Charles Edward Lincoln III. Yoninah (talk) 12:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.