Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Franklin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Franklin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All I'm seeing are bit parts. If you look at the articles for the movies that she has appeared in, she doesn't appear in the cast list for any of them, suggesting that she has no roles worth mention here on Wikipedia. Article was prodded, prod tag removed by User:MB298 for no reason that I can understand. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm unable to locate significant coverage to meet WP:GNG, and the subject's roles to date appear to fall short of WP:ENT. gongshow talk 01:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough Socerb102 (talk) 16:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note The article creator just posted on my talk page (here), suggesting that she might be notable as a musician. I'm not convinced. From what I've been able to find, she has a band called Reality something, which doesn't seem to have good third-party coverage. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.