Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronics Mart India Limited
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. UtherSRG (talk) 12:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Electronics Mart India Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:ROUTINE coverage fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Article fails
WP:NCORP. Sources do not meet WP:SIGCOV from RS. FreeEncyclo (talk) 04:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC) bad faith nomination by sock. Akevsharma (talk) 12:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. FreeEncyclo (talk) 04:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: According to the guidelines outlined in WP:LISTED, a company that is publicly traded is considered notable if it has independent press coverage and analyst reports as sources. The article in question contains three credible analyst reports and an adequate amount of independent press coverage. Akevsharma (talk) 05:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note Akevsharma is the creator of the article. FreeEncyclo (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note : Prior to this nomination, the nominator has made a few edits (less than 15), with their most recent edit dating back to March 2018. Akevsharma (talk) 06:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note Akevsharma is the creator of the article. FreeEncyclo (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep because it passes WP:LISTED as it has independent press coverage and analyst sources. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Which sources do you think meet WP:CORPDEPTH? FreeEncyclo (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
* Delete: Subject fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG, as nominator also mentioned it. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 06:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC) blocked as a sock. Akevsharma (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Misterrrrr, We are talking about WP:LISTED here. Please read the criteria. Akevsharma (talk) 06:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.