Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro-tron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electro-tron

Not notable. There does not appear to be enough reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy to maintain an independent article on this topic. -- Suntag ☼ 10:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are many things for which reliable references cannot be provided, one of which would be independant artists. The author of this article has done everything he or she can to cite references. Deleting this article could serve as grounds for deleting many articles that wikipedia needs to call itself a complete encyclopedia. -- 207.34.126.10 (talk · contribs · logs) 17:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. Also concerns of original research given the sources cite a personal interview. -- Whpq (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete. Being unable to find sources is a good definition of non-notable. Including non-notable artists is not part of wikipedia's aims: we don't include every person on the planet all because they have all drawn a picture before. Reliable sources have to show them to be notable, which this one doesn't. They also fail the more lax requirements of WP:Music.Yobmod (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.