Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elections in Pichilemu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 14:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elections in Pichilemu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local elections in a place of pop. 14,000, fails WP:NEVENT, refbombed with WP:ROUTINE coverage from local papers and the Chilean election department. Kraxler (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this and the other Pichilemu-related articles. Kraxler is disrupting the project to show a point: local stuff in non-first world countries does not matter. (And yes, there is plenty of material for this kind of thing, I mean, elections...) Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 01:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC) User:Diego Grez-Cañete is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per WP:AFDFORMAT.[reply]

What are you talking about? Removing content that does not belong to the project has nothing to do with "disruption". And this has nothing to do with first or third world issues. If you see first world articles equally inappropriate for the project nominate them for deletion. Sietecolores (talk) 07:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG. No encyclopedic relevance. --Keysanger (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: hyperlocal topic with hyperlocal coverage. Vrac (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- So should we delete every other "elections in" article because they are hyperlocal, or is it just because this is not important to you know who? Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All hyperlocal elections should be deleted, per WP:GEOSCOPE. It's not a question of preference, but of the notability guidelines. Kraxler (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then go out and nominate them, Kraxler. Until then, I have the right to think this is some sort of agenda against a Chilean town-related articles. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 23:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NPA. And WP:OTHERSTUFF. Kraxler (talk) 00:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:GEOSCOPE criteria. --War ko ^talk 00:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As stated above the topic is hyperlocal and Wikipedia do not cover elections in small towns at this level of detail. Diego Grez-Cañete has an own website about Pichilemu, why not develop the topic there? Sietecolores (talk) 06:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it matter that I have a "website about Pichilemu"? Please remain on topic. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As said before, per WP:GEOSCOPE and hyperlocal coverage. --Sfs90 (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Sfs90, y si nomino tus artículos de las elecciones de Coquimbo y Huasco? (What if I nominate your articles on the Huasco and Coquimbo elections?) Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no articles on "Elections in Coquimbo" or "Elections in Huasco". Kraxler (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I meant, the es.wiki ones; that Wikipedia is way more restrictive about local stuff. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then please discuss/nominate them there, please stay on-topic here. Kraxler (talk) 16:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WAX and WP:OTHERLANGS. --War ko ^talk 17:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

lol Warko, you're actually learning Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this harassing behavior now, Diego. Sietecolores (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is you the one who is harassing people, Sietecolores. Stop being a douche. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.