Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldar (Warhammer 40,000)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Warhammer 40,000#Aeldari. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eldar (Warhammer 40,000)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional race from WH40K. The article is, unfortunatlely, a mix of pure WP:FANCRUFTy plot summary (referenced to game materials) and a discussion of gameplay (unreferenced, so OR-ish). My BEFORE failed to find anything that's not a WP:GAMEGUIDE. Even if someone can find some independent sources, given the state of the article, I think WP:TNT is needed. The best WP:ATD I can think of is redirecting to Warhammer_40,000#Aeldari (on that note, IF this article is kept, it may need to be renamed, per the claim in the WH40K article that the faction name has changed...). PS. This was PRODed in 2020 by User:TTN, then a merge was suggested by User:BOZ to the same target I mentioned; shortly afterward User:Necrothesp declined both the PROD and the MERGE, requesting AfD, so - here we go. Considering that the Warhammer_40,000#Aeldari section is unreferenced, maybe copying some (primary) references from this there would be of some value. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Games. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Warhammer 40,000#Aeldari unless more sourcing is found. BOZ (talk) 05:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above, major fictional faction but that’s about it. Dronebogus (talk) 09:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, fine content to have under Warhammer generally, totally fails to stand on its own though... — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.