Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elbe Crossing 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Electricity sector in Germany#Transmission network. Mz7 (talk) 19:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elbe Crossing 1

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, routine, power-transmission towers. Alsee (talk) 03:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep for now - I think some work probably needs to be done figuring out the strength of the German sourcs for this and Elbe Crossing 2 and integrating them into the main article, and possibly a merge of the two articles should be performed, but given that this appears to be a large and important piece of infrastructure deleting it seems off. Artw (talk) 18:14, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is a giant electric pole. I see no coverage that isn't WP:MILL. If there are missing German sources, the article on the German Wikipedia can be improved. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Followup Comment by nominator: I did an exhaustive search on Elbe_Crossing_2, per my comment on that AFD. My search on Elbe_Crossing_1 was not as exhaustive, however it was pretty clear that Elbe_Crossing_2 is the larger and more significant of the two. Alsee (talk) 20:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Electricity_sector_in_Germany#Transmission_network. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss the proposed redirect per WP:ATD-R.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge There is no mention of these towers in Electricity_sector_in_Germany#Transmission_network, so a Redirect is not appropriate. Merge into Elbe Crossing 2. MB 03:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I closed the AfD on Elbe Crossing 2 as a merge into Elbe Crossing 1, not realizing this article was also at AfD. While I personally think the two articles could be merged, when looking at both AfD's in their totality, my making that decision might be a !supervote. When you look at the two discussions, the best course might be to merge what can be merged from both articles into Electricity_sector_in_Germany#Transmission_network, as per RoySmith's suggestion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed two typos in Onel5969's comment, because mixing up 1 and 2 could be very confusing to any readers in the future. Alsee (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.