Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elazar IX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing as delete rather than redirect because IMO there are damned unlikely search terms. No objection if someone disagrees and wants to make redirects. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elazar IX[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has no information beyond that available at Samaritan High Priest. Can be redirected back there. MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No content, no notability, just make it a redirect.

Hyperwave11 (talk) 05:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Samaritan High Priest. As this is clearly a totally useless fork of the Samaritan High Priest article. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because of they meet the same criteria:

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect all - Add nothing to the encyclopaedia beyond what is already included in Samaritan High Priest. --John B123 (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Even though I only voted for the first article, I'm fine with all of them being deleted or redirected. Since it looks like they are just more of the same. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tsedaka II ben Tabia ha'Åbtå'i and Shalma I ben Phinhas now have more content that differentiates them, discussing the precedent in succession that occurred with them. Content which is not duplicated from the main article SiliconProphet (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.