Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ek Lootere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ek Lootere

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE. All currents sources are database sites.

PROD removed with "AfD it" with no improvements/reviews added. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reason not to PROD this. I see no SIGCOV, no evidence that this meets NFLIM, and nothing comes up in a BEFORE search. House Blaster^talk 16:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, a review of TOI has been inserted as reference. Pinakpani (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources are for this article do not provide enough information to establish notability. I've included a table with the reliability for the sources used in this article. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
India Times	~ WP:RSP notes that this publisher is pro India in it's coverage	Article has no concerage or author	Article is a synopsis of the movie	✘ No
bollywoodhungama.com	? Unable to determine if coverage would be independent, website is more of a database	? Article shows only box office data with notes about there not being data	Article is a synopsis of the movie	✘ No
Box Office India	? Unable to determine if coverage would be independent, website is more of a database	Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_13#Boxofficeindia.com	Information is just about box office performance	✘ No
cinestaan	? Unable to establish if this source is independent	? Article has no concerage only synopsis	Article is a synopsis of the movie	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Delete. No reliable reviews. @Pinakpani: The source you are talking about has no review. DareshMohan (talk) 07:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per no reviews and reliable independent sources. Assirian cat (talk) 10:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.