Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eightydays

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio 09:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eightydays[edit]

Eightydays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company article reads like native advertising. The sources are a mixture of unreliable (Forbes Contributor), promotional adapted press releases and minor coverage, so it does not pass WP:CORPDEPTH in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There is a nice mention in National Geographic but it doesn't add up to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There is no advertising here — just a description of the service. Sources may be imperfect. If anyone wants the article can be improved, I think. --Sorrow3 (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorrow3 is the creator of the article, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I do not see any signs of notability. Wikisaurus (talk) 00:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.