Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Aleaziz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ehsan Aleaziz[edit]
Deprodded. Suspicion of a hoax. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As the original prod-der, I re-state my reasoning: "Sources give the CFO as Warren C. Jenson." ... discospinster talk 23:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete apparent hoax attempt. The "EA" in EA Games stands for Electronic Arts, not Ehsan Aleaziz. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as above (and is there no way to ban the user for creating hoaxes?) --ArmadilloFromHell 02:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above shows the highest concentration of super- to ultra-high color co-efficient signatures in any known location on the Wikipedia. 68.39.174.238 11:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you go so far as to call it art? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Cool! A WP:SIG pyjama party! I'm in! - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you go so far as to call it art? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above shows the highest concentration of super- to ultra-high color co-efficient signatures in any known location on the Wikipedia. 68.39.174.238 11:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- While the signatures themselves display obvious and wanton and egregious creativity, the above organization is based solely on automatic or nearly automatic neurophysical repetition and pattern used since time immemorial and is possibly very likely lacking in the requisite originality to possess a copyright, per the Soverign Coort. Hence they are also, per the same Coort, offically likely very possibly art. 68.39.174.238 10:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.