Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolutionary Council

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Revolutionary Council[edit]

Egyptian Revolutionary Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NTEMP, just a movement established in 2014 with propaganda then disappeared after few months, their website doesn't work too, no achievements, political effects nor notable activities, I think it is (WP:NEWSBRIEF) a news story covered in many newspapers.

also 5 of 10 refs in the article from their website, and that is against (Independent of the subject). Ibrahim.ID ✪ 11:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: please don't confuse with Egyptian Revolutionary Command Council. --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 11:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 08:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Half the links are from a source not independent of the subject; and several of the other links I checked appear to be dead. If the subject gains more notability going forward the page can be revived and improved.10Sany1? (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
actually I agree now. The redirect I suggested would probably not be optimal. Mccapra (talk) 03:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.