Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egypt Yellow Pages Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt Yellow Pages Ltd

Other pages by the same poster have been speedy deleted as spam advertising. This was nominated, but another editor felt that it didn't meet the criteria for speedy as spam. I beg to differ. While perhaps the topic might warrant a page if secondary sourcing is available, as it stands today it pure advertising. Barring a complete reworking of the article, it should be deleted, like its brethren have. This doesn't bar recreation if the article is not spam. Cerejota (talk) 19:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 19:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Cerejota (talk) 00:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- Cerejota (talk) 00:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I attempted to clean out the promotional material of the article. All that's left to do is ascertain whether the article meets other guidelines such as WP:V and WP:N. Themfromspace (talk) 01:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, it gives enough info anyway.. but notable? dunno --hnnvansier (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note - this is a spammer, has recreated already previously speedied deleted material in multiple times. The latest being Turkey Yellow Pages LLC.--Cerejota (talk) 08:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Turkey" page has been SALTed. Of course, salted turkey is nasty, but I am just sayin'...--Cerejota (talk) 06:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to be notable. Themfromspace (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Two are press releases from the company, which are not reliable sources. The other two links didn't load, but I doubt they're much better. As such, there isn't really an independant assertion of notability. --Sigma 7 (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.