Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egopay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Egopay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence for notability of this somewhat promotional article on a routine company. DGG ( talk ) 05:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Routine promotional article. Having to use Alexia as one of only three sources is damning enough. Seyasirt (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.