Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eenasul Fateh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eenasul Fateh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Unreliable sources. - AlbeitPK (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AlbeitPK (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AlbeitPK (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP There are some reliable sources in Books, which are not used as citations in the article. KEEP, Edit, and cite properly. But it should not be deleted. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 23:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has enough reliable sources already. Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I fail to see notability guidelines being meet.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG is not satisfied. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We only have unreliable sources and passing mentions. NeverTry4Me's book search does not convince me of the existence of reliable in-depth replacements. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Jdcooper (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find any scholarly work or anything in the academic domain; fails WP:PROF. per above also fails WP:GNG--Paulstar57 (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not, and seems unable to, pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Cabrils (talk) 22:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.