Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Mayberry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Mayberry[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found of any Notability, and no obvious redirect target. Fram (talk) 06:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Massachusetts. Fram (talk) 06:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 08:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Yet another faceless private who died of disease before ever getting overseas; there's nothing here providing any basis for notability whatsoever. This is a pretty startling gaffe (as is the one for the co-namer of the town legion hall) from someone with the creator's edit count, and might warrant a look into their other creations. Ravenswing 08:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge a brief section into his hometown's article, he's got the Legion post named after him. Rest is nothing notable, dying from the Spanish Flu would be considered routine. Oaktree b (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A non notable building by a private organisation is named after him and one other, no reason why this building or this soldier should be included in the town article per WP:UNDUE. Fram (talk) 14:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

... and merge what, precisely? Ravenswing 12:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. I agree that a brief section would be WP:UNDUE as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete outright on account of failing the notability criteria and without any merging. Text unsupported by sources should be deleted and not dumped elsewhere. -The Gnome (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.