Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Kubzar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the opinion by Lonjing because they aren't making an Argument. Sandstein 07:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Kubzar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet our criteria for notability. He won a minor competition, some websites have covered that. No reliable source coverage and nothing to show that the subject would meet SNGs either —SpacemanSpiff 19:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 19:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 19:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now likely until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 21:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spiff, SwisterTwister I declined the speedy deletion of Edwin Kubzar, a page which was tagged for speedy deletion. By using wikipedia, I agree to the Terms of Use and Policy. It was not a minor competition. Moreover, reliable sources are not available online. But hope this helps http://www.easternmirrornagaland.com/in-conversation-with-edwin-kubzar/ Lonjing (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~keep - needs better sources. Is notable in India. DangerDogWest (talk) 06:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep - Thank you DangerDogWest. Lonjing (talk) 08:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the one source provided above is an interview, therefore a primary source and invalid for determining notability. News gave a couple of brief mentions; Newspapers, Books, Scholar and Highbeam returned zero hits. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.