Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Ritchie Bellemare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Ritchie Bellemare[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:DIPLOMAT. he was simply a Chargés d'affaires ad interim which is not the full status of a permanent ambassador. LibStar (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find coverage in reliable sources, and he was never a permanent ambassador. Pburka (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 21:47, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notability. It's important to note that diplomats are civil servants, and few actually receive in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Nick-D (talk) 01:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand this logic. Are you suggesting that because diplomats are civil servants, they're less likely than other people to receive coverage in reliable sources? Pburka (talk) 01:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.