Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward P. Brynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edward P. Brynn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, not a single secondary source. Nothing found on Google News, nothing useful on Google Books. ScrapIronIV de-prodded the article claiming automatic notability by virtue of WP:NPOL #1, but there are two problems with that. Firstly, a career diplomat is not a politician, and secondly, I don't think "ambassador" is what's meant by "international office" - that would be "UN Secretary General" or the like. Huon (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As above, quick search, seems not notable.Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:42, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would support an SNG that makes ambassadors notable but the community disagreed, so ambassadors are not notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete no inherent notability of ambassadors. And only primary sources provided. LibStar (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability. His entry at the State Department doesn't suggest that he did anything but occupy two chairs.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable bio of someone doing their jobs. A government functionary. Kierzek (talk) 15:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.