Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Campusano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Campusano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable free agent minor leaguer who is 27 and never played above AA. Alex (talk) 09:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is my belief that any level of professional baseball, even Minor League Baseball in the U.S., is sufficient to pass WP:N.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A simple google search reveals enough RS coverage for this to be a clear keep.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with Epeefleche above, a Google search does provide enough significant coverage (i.e. more than just stats). Additionally, it appears that he did play at least one MLB game during spring training with the Chicago Cubs in 2009.[1] This appears to meet the baseball notability essay WP:MLB/N; while I'm not certain they intended to include spring training games, they are not specifically excluded either. I've left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Notability asking for clarification. Wine Guy Talk 07:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd say delete as non-notable, but he was a Rule 5 pick, and that might be enough. --Muboshgu (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.