Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Budgen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Church of England. MBisanz ^talk 05:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Budgen

The notability of this article was challenged back in September 2008 and there has been no serious response. It was earlier proposed for deletion but the author objected. PatGallacher (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - my GBooks1 & GBooks2 search finds little of use, and the 2 personal www pages cited on the Article are less than impressive. If reliable evedence were provided, I could be swayed, but not on what there currently is. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 09:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The online references are limited. But the paper references in the Egham museam are deep. Ok he wasn't exactly prime minister, but to delete such people from 100 years ago, when we keep modern people when they have, say, a notable blog for 15 minutes, is un helpful bias.Obina (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)bias.[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 06:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to a mention in Church of England. Unprejudiced to recreation if secondary sources can be found about him to satisfy WP:N Themfromspace (talk) 03:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.