Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Educo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. The only alive source that isn't run-of-the-mill is the Irish Times one, and that is a "What's going on" piece which dedicates a short paragraph to advertise an event Educo were doing. Nothing in-depth. Opting for AFD over PROD due to previous deletions. SITH (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Barely a mention in the main quality Irish media (Irish Times [1]) or Irish Independent [2]); and they are from 2009. Fails NORG. Britishfinance (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Britishfinance. Available sources (in the article and elsewhere) do not meet thresholds expected by WP:SIGCOV or WP:NCORP. COI/SPA overtones also a concern. Guliolopez (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.