Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmond Astruc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 01:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edmond Astruc[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability, has not received significant coverage in multiple published secondary reliable sources, see Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals, furthermore eventually COI CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There is a book about the subject (Garrigues, Jean-Claude (2016). Le siècle bleu de Marseille: Edmond Astruc, peintre-aviateur (1878-1977). L'Harmattan. ISBN 9782343074566. Retrieved 1 June 2020.) and the Musée Municipal Méditerranéen in Cassis had an exhibition in 2017: "Entre ciel et mer, la passion bleue d'Edmond Astruc"[1]. AllyD (talk) 07:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AllyD, thanks but this should has been implemented into the article by the creator...✌️in its current state it definitely lacks notability... CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article appears to be a Google-translation of the French WP article, which was largely written before the publication and exhibition. Here we're not really considering the present state of the article - which needs substantial attention - but whether notability can be established. The publication and exhibition are a start towards that, but I am dubious that they (or the acquisition of one of his works by the Marseille Chamber of Commerce: [2]) are sufficient for WP:NARTIST criterion 4. I'd like to verify that he was noted more than locally. AllyD (talk) 08:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 18:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.