Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editor Rani Alsaboory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Rani Alsaboory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of Rani Alsaboory which was deleted WP:A7. This article was created by a sockpuppet of the editor who created the original, has no reliable sources and still fails to demonstrate notability. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Created by undisclosed paid editor in violation of Wikimedia Terms of Use and there is no evidence of notability from reliable independent sources. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:32, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nominator. In light of the previous deletion, we can remove the article as a G4, as well as a G5 if the checkuser tests come back positive. If both of these fail, there is no way that she is notable enough to satisfy GNGs.

Ivanvector - any chance I could have a link to the sockpuppet investigation, please? ↅ𝜞 _{(Contact me) (See my edits)} 23:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GammaRadiator: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raju Adhikari. This doesn't qualify for G4 speedy deletion as there was no prior discussion, otherwise I would have deleted it. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator as product of a sockpuppet. Quis separabit? 02:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as a non-notable person. Recreation of this article, after deletion, by a sockpuppet, and for money? Delete it two or three times if you can. --Lockley (talk) 05:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.