Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edit conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Help:Edit conflict. D e ath phoenix 17:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Was a cross-namespace redirect, then got changed into an interwiki redirect, and finally into a soft redirect to meta. Should be deleted for the same reasons cross-namespace redirects on the article namespace are deleted. cesarb 00:06, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to a cross-namespace re-direct. Georgia guy 00:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Specifically, a re-direct to Help:Edit conflict. Georgia guy 00:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It seems like we disambiguate for project spaces when there is something real in the namespace. I don't know how this policy applies when there is no non-wiki article to put there. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 06:24, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Help:Edit conflict. Angr/talk 09:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Batmanand 15:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have separate namespaces to keep things that matter only to the Wikipedia separated from articles. As a redirect, it defies that. - Liberatore(T) 18:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What Liberatore said. Gerard Foley 21:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Same thing as above: edit conflict, especially in this redirect, refers to Wikipedia related information. --Jay(Reply) 21:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Leave as redirect, either to meta or to Help. Redirects are cheap. Additionally, this should be on WP:RFD, not here. Stifle 12:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that was a problem for me: it's a redirect, so it should go to RfD; but it's a soft redirect, so probably RfD wouldn't accept it, so it should go to AfD; except that it's not an article, so it should go to MfD; and we also have CSD, PROD and IAR. It sort of fell in an area which is not exactly for any of of the processes, but I had to chose one. --cesarb 17:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Stifle. --Billpg 11:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Liberatore. —Ruud 01:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all obnoxious "soft redirects". — Feb. 21, '06 [19:02] <freakofnur_xture|talk>
Delete per Liberatore. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.