Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edib Kürkçü

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Talk · ^Review 00:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edib Kürkçü[edit]

Contested prod. Prod reason "Player fails notability at WP:ATHLETE having never played in a fully-professional league/competition" still stands. Rettetast (talk) 10:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, it looks as if he may be on the fringes of International selection. However all the external links on the article are broken. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - youth player with no top level experience. Fails WP:Athlete. Parslad (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has never played at a professional level, only for the club's under-age affiliate team. Claim that he was called up to the national squad is unlikely but possible (I find it hard to believe that a strong national team like Turkey would call up a player who has never played for his club's first team, but I guess it's possible), however it is unsourced and being a non-playing squad member doesn't confer notability anyway...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:ATHLETE. The TFF website only lists one Kürkçü, and it's not Edib. Jogurney (talk) 20:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as player fails WP:ATHLETE. Giant Snowman 20:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE. When/if he plays professionally, could be reposted. -- Alexf^(talk) 12:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.