Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgeville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edgeville[edit]

Very little content about a town that likely doesn't exist Jay Carlson 05:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't exist, article states it is from RuneScape. --Will Mak 050389 05:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In which case it should be deleted or merged because we don't need an article on every single town in Runescape. Dark Shikari 13:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "mergeto" tag to the article, but am unsure if it is notable enough to be added to RuneScape (I don't know much about the game). --Will Mak 050389 13:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Redirect No way of staying on it's notability, nothing to right about. redirect either to the main runescape page or the runescape location page as this article has no hope. J.J.Sagnella 13:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed merge template to point to RuneScape locations. --Will Mak 050389 13:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without redirect. There's no content to merge into the already overlong Runescape article, and there are many Edgevilles out there - one in Nashville, one in Georgia, never mind the millions in cheap sci-fi books - no reason this should point to Runescape in particular. Vizjim 14:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect to RuneScape locations per J.J.Sagnella OR speedy disambiguate per Vizjim, direct creator to the RuneScape wiki; this type of article I like to call a 'rogue subpage'. :-) CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 01:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak merge/redirect It depends on if this town is notable for anything or not. --HResearcher 10:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 13:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom--Peephole 14:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)--[reply]
Merge/Delete I don't think a redirect is warranted for a town from a video game. See also Vizjim's comment above. --HResearcher 15:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect. Non-notable in itself, but part of a notable topic. --Gray Porpoise 22:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If this is kept, it should be a disambig page, not a redirect because there are many Edgetowns. --HResearcher 09:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no mergeable content. In actual fact, the Wilderness starts right after the last house to the north.??? Redirect can be put in later. ~ trialsanderrors 08:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no merge, per trialsanderrors. Ifnord 23:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.