Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgeryders
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 05:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Edgeryders[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edgeryders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This "social enterprise" does not seem to have enough significant coverage or reliable sources to meet WP:NORG. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Websites, and Europe. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, I can find almost nothing about the org that is not hosted on its own website or LinkedIn. I did find [1] but I don't think it's enough. LizardJr8 (talk) 18:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.