Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgardo M. Latrubesse
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edgardo_M._Latrubesse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Problems with sourcing and notablity of the person.
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 December 21. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:52, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. This is somewhat strange. The nomination was made by the same editor who started the article, also the article previously had much more content. Albeit much WP:PRIMARY content. Geschichte (talk) 12:33, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. The information on the page is outdated and now that I know the notability guidelines I should have never made it. sounny —Preceding undated comment added 14:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Ten publications with over 100 citations each in Google Scholar [1] is enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1. And according to his cv [2] he has been Raymond Dickson Centennial Professor at the University of Texas, passing #C5. Honorary Corresponding Member of the National Council of Research of Argentina might pass #C3 and the Premio Internacional Augusto González de Linares might pass #C2. He seems to have moved to the Earth Observatory of Singapore [3] but leaving Texas is not a reason for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, possibly snow. The citation numbers in a lower citation field are enough. And here's a reliable source for WP:NPROF C5. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.