Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar de Evia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar de Evia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography for a non-notable photographer. damiens.rf 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. damiens.rf 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A simple google books search revealed multiple sources with independent significant coverage (just scroll through the first 4 or 5 pages). Clearly a competent WP:BEFORE was not done. I found a review of his work in The New York Times: See: "COLOR IN REVIEW: Popular Photography's Color Annual Surveys Medium's Current Status How Creative Is Color?" Range of Effects Color vs. Black and White". The New York Times. 19 May 1957. p. X17.4meter4 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep multiple hits on Google books indicate that the subject was much discussed and there is no shortage of references about him. Mccapra (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.