Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edenspiekermann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 00:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edenspiekermann[edit]

Edenspiekermann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Non-notable organization, sourcing does not appear to exist. Article creator was a WP:SPA – Muboshgu (talk) 00:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question: - what about the "further reading" section - some of those refs are paper. Are they not valid? --A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 03:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Just based on their titles, as I have not read them, they don't look to be coverage of the company, but rather relevant to the industry. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Looking them up on Google Books they just appear to be about graphic design or logo design in general, also the first one is an autobiography of the founder of the company. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Sources are nothing but press releases. Fails WP:NCORP. GTrang (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.