Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edelweiss Cheung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edelweiss Cheung

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the criteria of WP:ENTERTAINER B dash (talk) 08:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:GNG with http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2008-07/23/content_6868870.htm http://www.womenofchina.cn/html/report/93908-1.htm (lifted from xinhua the major news agency in China) and still in the news a decade later: http://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/people-events/article/2109677/miss-hong-kong-2017-juliette-louie-and-four-other Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:ENT & coverage is shallow and incidental. Insufficient to build an NPOV bio. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Finally, there are reliable sources available now. E.g.:

http://scmp.com/lifestyle/fashion-beauty/article/2146391/miss-hong-kong-pageant-runner-who-was-big-winner-when ,South China Morning Post (since 3 day ago) http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2008-07/23/content_6868870.htm ,China Daily http://english.sina.com/p/1/2008/0720/172356.html ,Sina english — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.50.214.138 (talk) 11:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added reliable sources in Main article and re-create new version and wiki style.

.. 74.50.214.138 (talk)

Keep. Thanks for brushing up the article. Deryck C. 16:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.