Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddswars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eddswars

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable and possibly made up series. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like a blatant hoax. This appears to be partially copied from Eddsworld, oddly. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although this hoax article is based on a real article to give it a thin veneer of faux reliability, it remains a hoax.Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also eligible for G5 deletion. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if only for the persistent editing by the various sockpuppets of User:Peluches extronidos. However as a hoax it should be speedy deleted. --10mmsocket (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.