Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Klint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Klint[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not demonstrated after tagging for four years. It was proposed for deletion early on, but the PROD template was removed without explanation. – Fayenatic London 18:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like he isn't notable. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning keep/comment - Hmm. There are a couple interviews/articles from 2006 on Google Books, and in 2008, he was held up as the first example of his type of model.[1] One of the 2006 articles, in Elle says much the same thing: "the current class president of Prada's art-school look." He was a big part of the Prada look and was the male "face" of Prada for a while and has had quite a successful and long running career. Quite a bit of ongoing coverage in publications (and webzines) such as Fashionisto. His problem is that he's a guy and 99 times out of 100, the media would rather write about pretty girls, but he has had a pretty large amount of coverage and exposure, still ongoing (which in model terms is VERY impressive), and certainly seems as if he ought to be covered somewhere. Mabalu (talk) 12:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as non-notable; doesn't meet, IMO, threshold for WP:FASHION. Quis separabit? 15:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.