Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco Logika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 17:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eco Logika[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional piece on a fashion label that does not show how it is notable. Was created with multiple references but they were for the most part deceptive. Most did not verify claims made or are not independent reliable sources or were just links to organisations homepages. Some were dead but a look at the links and the websites they point to suggests more of the same problems. Given the deceptive and promotional nature of this article and the lack of independent coverage about Eco Logika this article should be deleted. (Note that this is one of multiple deceptively sourced articles by a blocked spammer creating a walled garden around Liana Werner-Gray). duffbeerforme (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 2 dead links and a not-in-citation-given don't add up to reliable sources. If the other articles are similar they will all need to be deleted. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:22, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very hard to assume good faith; in any case, the subject is about as notable as your corner pizza shop. complainer (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.