Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoQuest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW keep, multiple reliable sources demonstrated. (non-admin closure) _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EcoQuest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

totally unsourced WP:OR promo Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG handily (non-trivial coverage in multiple books and magazines). Regards, HaeB (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per HaeB, the sources exist but aren't mentioned in the article which means that this article needs to either get properly sourced (as it could be original research in this state) or entirely re-written, but the game is notable. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Improper WP:BEFORE. Article needs to be improved, not deleted. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.