Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoProfit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator is encouraged to look in non-English new sources in future nominations. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EcoProfit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails GNG and WP:CORP. If you search up the topic, chances are it will take you to a organization in Africa. I also couldnt find anything on the internet about this, aswell the article might be promotional or original research. The person who created the page only created the page and Cleaner production left. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 07:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

???? what are you talking about, go to the City of Graz Webpage, to the pages of Munich, Zurich, you will find it by the German word ÖKOPROFIT, go to GIZ India and you will find it there. It is a model internationally used by municipalities and associations to reduce waste, increase energy efficiency in companies. What is your problem? 217.149.160.237 (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, tough it's understandable why an article like this, that hasn't been sourced or made encyclopaedic in the last 14 years, would be nomminated for deletion. But a Google News search for the German language title reveals numerous lengthy repuatble news articles about various Ökoprofit projects and initiatives. Sionk (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.