Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecky-ecky-ecky-ecky f'tang-zoop-boing! Goodem-zoo-owli-zhiv
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete HappyCamper 03:14, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
We are no longer the Knights Who Say Ni. We do not believe this individual line from one of the best movies ever is notable enough to merit its own article. Delete. — JIP | Talk 09:24, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A one-line quote from a movie is not encyclopedic unless it has become a really famous catchphrase. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:34, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I am rather fond of the movie in question, but specific jokes do not merit their own separate articles - Skysmith 09:42, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreeing with above. Even highly notable lines do not get their own entry but instead are listed as part of the movie in which they appeared. See [[1]]. Dottore So 09:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- More usually, the article on the movie in which they occur contains an interwiki link to a Wikiquote article for the movie. See Wikiquote:Spider-Man (movie), Wikiquote:Mystery Men, Wikiquote:Gone with the Wind, and — indeed — Wikiquote:Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Uncle G 11:17, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Skysmith. Also, they've spelt it wrong. TheMadBaron 11:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Redirects are cheap and discourage recreation. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 11:49, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per everyone. - Just zis Guy, you know? 12:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While redirects are cheap, how in the world is anybody going to find this one? — Lomn | Talk / RfC 14:55, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It discourages recreation, for one. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 15:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per Man in Black. 23skidoo 15:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect. Then you must cut down the tallest tree in the forest with...a herring. You can call me Al 16:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not merit a separate page prashanth
- Hell, I would have speedied this. But delete, anyway. Don;t bother with a redirect. No one is going to search this, nor can I imagine anyone trying to search this matching this spelling exactly. -R. fiend 21:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- REDIRECT. This is an obvious candidate for redirection, since the Knights who say Ni entry is going to remain and that's what this is about. What's the point of deleting? Bryan 00:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN, that's not how you spell it.
- Delete, Ehh what the heck. Redirect also
Radiant_>|< 17:17, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.