Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echinique Place, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Echinique Place, Arizona[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Appears to be an old ranch or homestead with no evidence of notability. (Split from previous batch AfD) –dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Former ranch, no results found on newspapers.com. Reywas92^Talk 21:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Concur with nom/Reywas92. NN place, nothing but a ranch site with a water tank. MB 01:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Echinique Place, Arizona First nomination for deletion. Was a Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Reywas92, Very little to nothing about this area. Does not pass geoland or gng. Lightburst (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; how does this not pass GEOLAND? J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 22:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if Merge is not an option. Do not see this as notable under WP:GNG and definitely pushing the WP:GEOLAND to me. PenulisHantu (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete; passes GEOLAND but since it can't ever go past being a permastub with the current sourcing available there's no point keeping it. WP:NOTSTATS. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 22:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V, WP:MILL. I can't verify it was ever inhabited, but only that it had a weather tower, which is not by itself notable. Bearian (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.