Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebony Cavallaro (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ebony Cavallaro[edit]

Ebony Cavallaro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Award is not major. Lacks coverage in independent reliable. Just another journo doing their job. Prod removed because she had previously been discussed at afd even though she hadn't. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 11:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 11:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 11:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:BIO. The 2 sources provided are not third party. LibStar (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No RS ORPHAN article of local journalist. Agricola44 (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I am familiar with her work on TV, but there isn't the reliable, substantial, third party sources out there that would allow us to write a fair and neutral biography of her. WP:N. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.