Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebony Ayes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ebony Ayes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO Savonneux (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not only does subject not meet WP:PORNBIO, the subject doesn't even meet one of the PORNBIO criteria. --Cagepanes (talk) 07:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nom. Can't locate evidence of awards or other notability.— James Cantor (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. PORNBIO has come a long way since this article was kept in 2007. The main claim to notability was prolificness in genre, which is no longer a valid criterion. Fails PORNBIO without significant awards or reliably sourced acknowledgement of unique contributions to porn. Reliable source coverage is limited to passing mentions, not enough to satisfy GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet pornbio or gng guidelines. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Gene93k hits the nail on the head. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.