Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebony (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lara ❤Love 04:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ebony (album)[edit]

Non-notable unreleased album. No sources provided, no reliable sources found. Rolling Stone has a blank placeholder[1], so does MTV[2][3]. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unreleased, uncommented on and not cared about in the wider world - Peripitus (Talk) 10:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The album is unreleased and without significant coverage in reliable sources, as such it fails WP:MUSIC#Albums ("unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources") notability criteria. Atyndall93 | talk 11:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of reliable third party sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If the album was unreleased, how come the article includes a cover image? 23skidoo (talk) 14:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Happens often enough: a press release, advert, etc. will include a cover. Sometimes an unreleased album will leak and a fan will create a "cover" that never was to circulate with the boot. Or the album might have been close enough to release that sites like amazon, et al. put up "pre-order" pages, including the cover. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.