Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easytrade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm going to withdraw list--I was apparently confused by some other articles I was working on at the time. DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Easytrade[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for non-notable firm, founded to deal with government purchasing in a single country. No acceptable sources for notability. A companion article to Tradeshift--see adjacent AfD. DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not a firm, but an infrastructure. The article claims it is mandated by the law in Denmark. Hence inherent notability. See serious independent ref. [1] Staszek Lem (talk) 17:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

are you seriously claiming that all trade and other standards issued by all national goverments are notable? Then WP would be not an encyclopedic . but an indiscriminate .collection of government information. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.