Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy tyre and autocentres

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 19:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Easy tyre and autocentres[edit]

Easy tyre and autocentres (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local tyre repair centre. There are passing mentions in local news sources, and in a few industry reports, but nothing really that demonstrates it meets WP:NCORP. I've had a good look around for sources, but I can't really find there's enough to meet the required level. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Entirely unremarkable busines, no substantial sources.TheLongTone (talk) 13:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just an ad; not notable. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Most of the sources make no mentions of the topic itself (besides the ones associated with the topic), so it seems not very notable. Piguy101 (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an advert and a long way from it --TerraceGent (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We are still adding to this page and developing the content under guidance from other users. Please note that this brand is actually owned by Goodyear Dunlop one of the largest brands in the tyre industry in the world. We would appreciate feedback rather than just people saying delete. TerraceGent — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerraceGent (talkcontribs) 13:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there seems to be no sustantial independant coverage of this organisation.TheLongTone (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, we are collecting the independent coverage and putting it into the sources from the trade press and local news websites. --TerraceGent (talk) 14:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.