Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 19:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

East One

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This proposed building in Glasgow has never been built and in fact as far as can be told by searches never proceeded beyond a proposal. Wikipedia doesn't need to contain articles of every proposed concept for every tall building (i.e. notability).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Seaweed (talk • contribs) 12:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article shows height reduction, and no evidence of construction following 10 years of proposal. Reference links to a different building (in another country) so it appears kicked off the building database as well.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it was not added to that database. The reference should be http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=3340 (Skyscrapernews.com, not skyscraperpage). Peter James (talk) 21:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 22:44, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Peter James (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Peter James (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing for a currently better article with current details and there's also simply nothing else for better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.