Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East & West Magazine Vietnam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

East & West Magazine Vietnam

New Vietnamese magazine that has not necessarily proved its notability yet, certainly not in its first month. Page is basically ad copy Daniel Case 18:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete New magazine that has not yet established notability. And what's with all the random categories on the page, makes it look like it was intended to be an ad. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 21:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This page is informative for Vietnam indeed. Nothing to do with avertisement. But in Vietnam where the market for English magazines is so young one needs to communicate. Furthermore please be advised that this publication is high quality. Also please note that there is noe e-commerce reference whatosever. From the point of informing about progresses in the latest WTO member country, it is very important to note how much Vietnam has progressed and modernized in the media field. This is why this article should remain, thank you for your consideration changing your opinion. PN --Swissair 03:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)— Swissair (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Nothing to do with avertisement. But in Vietnam where the market for English magazines is so young one needs to communicate. In other words, it's an advertisement.
Furthermore please be advised that this publication is high quality. And this means what, exactly, regarding our standards of the magazine's notability?
From the point of informing about progresses in the latest WTO member country, it is very important to note how much Vietnam has progressed and modernized in the media field.. And that's why we have Media of Vietnam.
This is why this article should remain ..... All that matters here is this. And I don't see it, not with a brand new magazine. Daniel Case 05:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam per CSD G11, calling a spade a spade ;-) Ohconfucius 10:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. Calliopejen 19:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.