Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easily led: a history of propaganda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as WP:G7. Just Chilling (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Easily led: a history of propaganda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as the subject fails WP:BKCRIT. The paltry mentions I found don't indicate GNG to me and at present the article's only reference is the book itself. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agreed, the subject does not meet notability criteria in either WP:GNG or WP:BKCRIT. (the article has no content about the subject as a result) --♫CheChe♫ talk 12:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I suggest this fits into “criteria for speedy deletion” - and being sole contributor I decided to [[1]] -G7. Author requests deletion- disclaimer and I advise admins to enact it. --Fisuaq (talk) 12:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.