Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EaseUS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EaseUS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Nothing significant but another startup company. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a software product directory. They should have submit their Company brochure instead. Just because covered as Product review websites or get popularity on non-notable media does not provide any significance. 1000s of startups happens every day. Light2021 (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional format (reads like a brochure), promotional sources (they put its download.com page as a "review"!) and no evidence of notability - David Gerard (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete by all means as this is advertising to the max, none of it is anything else but listing its services, clients and business information, all PR; the sources of course are also not substantial, which is not surprising, as this was clearly planned to be a business listing and only that. SwisterTwister talk 22:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.