Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth Proxima

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 23:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Proxima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. The article seems to be an attempt to create buzz for a term that was coined in a 2016 video. The definition given in the lede is unsourced. Tarl N. (discuss) 15:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Either redirect to Earth analog or delete. "Earth Proxima" is not a term in widespread use, but "Earth analog" is. My Google searches for "Earth Proxima" turned up only a few hits, and as the nominator points out, it is essentially an arbitrary buzzword promoted by one documentary. Earth analog already does a good job of covering the material that this article seeks to convey, and I see no reason to duplicate that material by keeping this article. Astro4686 (talk) 08:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation for changed vote. Although I slightly favor a redirect, I would also support deletion for the reasons stated by the nominator. Astro4686 (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As nominator, I feel this article is simply attempting to leverage Wikipedia as a promotion vehicle. I don't think we should even bother with a redirect, the only article pointing to Earth Proxima (List of nearest terrestrial exoplanet candidates) does so in the context of mentioning the video. Other than that, it's an orphan. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not reiterate your deletion rationale with additional bolded !votes, per WP:AFDFORMAT. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 18:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- term not in widespread usage. Would also support a redirect, in that order of preference. Porphyro (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.